Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A trend towards lighter roasts?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ozscott
    replied
    Rolling sc will give max chocolate taste usually but it's a fine line here to burnt tastes also. Plus usually the roast has expanded so much by this time (on my typical 800g or higher sizes) that the corretto is no longer mixing as well and tipping can occur.

    Cheers

    Leave a comment:


  • cosmic_couple22
    replied
    Had a few different coffees at a well established Brisvegas location, was asked my opinion afterwards (they know I roast) gave them the honest answer. Thin zero body,
    no mouth feel, very high acidity like sucking on a lemon. Barrista reply "yes much better as a filter style and our roaster trends all his profiles towards light medium these days"
    Nothing wrong with his response just a shame we were drinking espresso, macchiato and a flat white.

    Coffee roasted for brewing methods, perfect. But should be sold the way the roaster intended.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dragunov21
    replied
    Fruity/floral flavours (I've been drinking Peru Ceja de Selva lately) have turned me towards mid-blacks (to a long black as a piccolo is to a latte).

    Leave a comment:


  • flynnaus
    replied
    When I feel that I should ask for some tequila and salt to down with the shot
    Hehehe. You may have indirectly stumbled on a marketing idea there Chris: the espresso 'slammer' or you could even add a worm

    Leave a comment:


  • chokkidog
    replied
    Originally posted by Talk_Coffee View Post
    I think that's the problem for me Flynn,

    There are some cafes which choose a very light roast and then use it as a "one fits all" solution.
    Chris
    The (coffee) crime of the century. :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • TC
    replied
    Originally posted by flynnaus View Post
    Good points and I am happy to have my perception corrected. I thought it was more about brewing methods and providing coffee suited to those methods (usually lighter). I guess I was under the misconception that the same light coffee was used for any brewing.
    ...I've learned about a 4th type: 'better'
    I think that's the problem for me Flynn,

    There are some cafes which choose a very light roast and then use it as a "one fits all" solution. If it's lemon espresso and tofu soy (or a refusal to do it), I don't get why they stubbornly refuse to serve better coffee. When I feel that I should ask for some tequila and salt to down with the shot, I reckon that the better mark was missed completely. I guess if you're not able to hit the dartboard at all, become a spectator rather than a participant.

    Cheers

    Chris

    Leave a comment:


  • flynnaus
    replied
    Originally posted by chokkidog View Post
    The term 'third wave' has a broader definition than the negative, prejudiced and narrow one spouted by more than a few on this site.
    Good points and I am happy to have my perception corrected. I thought it was more about brewing methods and providing coffee suited to those methods (usually lighter). I guess I was under the misconception that the same light coffee was used for any brewing. I can accept Gold's definition of 1st, 2nd and 3rd wave as quoted by the Wikipedia article; it makes sense in that context rather than applying any negative connotation.

    In the end it doesn't matter what it's called; there are really only three kinds of coffee: good, bad and drinkable. These mean different things to different people and it's up to them to decide. Since becoming a CSer I've learned about a 4th type: 'better'. That's driven my quest for good coffee for the last 5 years and what's 'good' now is a long way from what I thought was good in 2008 because, through CS I learned what makes 'better' coffee.

    Leave a comment:


  • kwantfm
    replied
    Acidity, sweetness, body... all of these things occur in context. I love acidity in white wine, couple that with some minerality and I'm pretty much in heaven. For my preferences distinct and prominent levels of acidity have less of a place in espresso, a little acidity is a requirement for balance, but a lot of acid (almost by definition for my palate) means that the end result is unbalanced. I don't want to give the impression that I'm one eyed about acidity...

    Leave a comment:


  • Journeyman
    replied
    Funny, I just posted over in the 'Can't make good coffee with Soy' thread about third wave. I'm not sure the market drives the 'new' style of coffee so much as the desire to be 'new' causes them to offer something else to the customers who want to be seen as ahead of the curve in some way. As in any fashion, it takes a certain classiness to be able to pull it off and many of those you see frequenting places for the newness (and who subsequently vanish off to the next 'new' place) have a slightly desperate look in the backs of their eyes as they try desperately to find a way to be individual... along with the 100,000 or so 'other' individuals doing exactly the same thing.
    Originally posted by Rocky View Post
    Whilst I think I would like to notice "floral & fruity notes" in my coffee, IF that means more acidity then I will pass.
    I am a lifelong winesnob and I always make the comparison with white wines.
    As a youngster I enjoyed rieslings, semillons, sauvignon blancs etc but in my later years I cannot tolerate the acidity of most examples of these varieties (at least until they have a bit of age)
    I'm the same with coffee. High acidity gives me reflux in a flash.
    Needless to say I avoid any cafes with light coloured beans in the hopper. I have no problem with new 'trends' as long as they don't find their way into my cup.
    I think it is the wines. It is hard to find s crisp semillon these days - they blend it with chardonnay than add in flavour-grapes to give it some appeal. And don't even ASK for a chablis - it doesn't exist any more. I used to like a good traminer riesling but these days they seem to think fruity means sweet.

    I don't normally get reflux but I went to a place in Flinders Lane a couple of months back & tried a long strong macchiato - I had to go back to get extra milk and still couldn't finish it. Then got little upchucks as I was walking away and had to go get something to eat to calm my stomach. I'll stick with a more traditional approach.

    Mind you the 'new' style might appeal to those who like to get their caffeine from those energy drinks - I don't like even the smell of those things so can't really say, but the smell seems similar to the taste of the new fad in coffee we are seeing in the fashion places.

    Leave a comment:


  • chokkidog
    replied
    And when we're done getting misinterpreting '3rd wave' we can get stuck into '4th wave' :-D

    http://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rc...50952593,d.aGc

    Leave a comment:


  • chokkidog
    replied
    Originally posted by NewToEspresso View Post
    Can someone explain what's this "third wave" thing?
    The term 'third wave' has a broader definition than the negative, prejudiced and narrow one spouted by more than a few on this site.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Wave_Coffee

    You will note that the definition given in the above link does mention lighter roasts but lighter than what?
    In context with North American coffee roasting I would put forward that it means anything lighter than carbon,
    or at least coffee that is not taken well into 2nd Crack.

    In Australia, in recent times, it seems to have been used by some to promote an 'us and them' division and refers
    to anyone roasting coffee to an appropriate level for alternate brewing methods (and which is generally unpalatable when made as an espresso).
    You'd think they had committed a crime. The crime, if there is one, is making these beans into espresso and then criticising the roaster.
    Sadly, it's true that some roasters think we will all like a mid roast as an espresso............ they are deluded, for sure, but not are not
    the definition of 'third wave'.

    Even Market Lane use a darker (than their pour over) roast for their espresso and select their beans for espresso
    from the mid to low acid range.

    I find lemony, acidic coffee made as espresso distinctly distasteful but I'm under the impression that anyone
    whose roasts are (mis) classified as '3rd wave' are being subjected to what is almost trolling, just because they're different.

    As someone once said, on an earlier and similar thread, this year............ CS'ers who buy single origins, who care about the
    provenance of their coffee and how it is produced and who don't roast to well into, or past, rolling second crack are all
    THIRD WAVERS. That just about all of us.
    Last edited by chokkidog; 21 August 2013, 06:03 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • kwantfm
    replied
    Originally posted by burr View Post
    On a related question, I can create the chocolately, caramelly, nutty and spicy aspects from my choice of beans, but does anyone have any suggestions to get that 'aroma' into a milk drink? As a primarily milk based coffee drinker I've steered clear of the beans described as 'floral' (Africans), but perhaps thats what I need?
    I do think that Africans (especially Ethiopians) will help you in your cause. Roast Yirgacheffe a little lighter (prior to 2C). Sidamo, Gambella, Ghimbi and Limu all work well at first snaps of 2C in my experience.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dimal
    replied
    You can achieve the best of both worlds you know...

    Try some single origin blending. Roast a small batch of your favourite bean and pull it before the onset of 2nd-Crack. Roast another batch the way you normally would and then try post-blending the two in different proportions, to see if you arrive at a blend that not only possesses all of the chocolatiness you strive for, but has some of the fruity goodness added in for even more interesting flavours.

    Chocolate and dark cherries are one of my favourite foods... Mmmm

    Mal.

    Leave a comment:


  • burr
    replied
    Recently, using my corretto I split the beans into 2 batches. One I dump at first sign of 2nd crack, and the other just into rolling 2nd. I found doing so I gain a bit more acidity to liven up my latte whilst retaining the body and dark flavours. Beans are divided accordingly, i.e. central americans into lighter roast, robusta into darker, split the others.

    On a related question, I can create the chocolately, caramelly, nutty and spicy aspects from my choice of beans, but does anyone have any suggestions to get that 'aroma' into a milk drink? As a primarily milk based coffee drinker I've steered clear of the beans described as 'floral' (Africans), but perhaps thats what I need? I *think* my roasting is fine, closed coretto with first crack at 11-12 and second at 15-16 like clockwork.

    So far I've had the pleasure of sampling the Eth. Gambella, Rwan. Nyungwe, MM Gold, Elephant Hills, Magundi robusta, Peru Ceja, Colum. Volcan, Hond. Montana, Sulawesi blue peaberry, Sumatra Wahana and PNG Wahgi (my favorite as a SO)

    Leave a comment:


  • NewToEspresso
    replied
    Wow... I would have thought there were more advocates of light roasts in here but it looks like I might not be an outcast after all in my preference for darker roasts...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X