Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

EM6900 Programming

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • EM6900 Programming

    Ok all you current and x EM6900 users..

    I am looking for info as the the advanced programming steps.

    Assumed.... Yea it got me ;D

    That the EM6910 and EM6900 would be the same / very close...

    Of the two boxes of parts that I have obtained from a recent request for dead units etc I am observing different things. But have no SB EM6900 user manual... The Links on the SB site no longer exist and need to confirm / refute my assumptions...

    Then I can be sure as to FAULTY controller board or NOT.


  • #2
    Re: EM6900 Programming

    IIRC there were no advanced programming options on the original 6900s.
    A few late models and refurbs had 6910 internals and they had 6910 internals with the options.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: EM6900 Programming

      Originally posted by 714D504B414057424A41250 link=1270768890/1#1 date=1270769793
      IIRC there were no advanced programming options on the original 6900s.
      A few late models and refurbs had 6910 internals and they had 6910 internals with the options.
      Arr I though as much.... THANK YOU.

      Used one at work some time ago and it did have... But the couple I have here do not appear to..

      PS. How is the dryer ?

      Did ya see the post http://coffeesnobs.com.au/YaBB.pl?num=1265274280/4#4

      What was ya findings ???

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: EM6900 Programming

        Ill have a read.

        When testing the element core to sheath I get the same reading as when the probes are not touching anything.

        It looks like an error code or similar as it doesnt mean anything to me and I have to find the instruction book to check its meaning.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: EM6900 Programming

          Originally posted by 6E524F545E5F485D555E3A0 link=1270768890/3#3 date=1270799832
          When testing the element core to sheath I get the same reading as when the probes are not touching anything.
          That is GOOD...

          Not a true test... But good.

          Some might say why not 100%. The issue is that the usual test with a multimeter is at low voltage and potential... Thus a meter with a a tenth (0.10) of a mm gap will show OPEN cct. Yet a 680v (240Rms) may well have the potential to cross that air gap.. Add a bit of moisture and carbon dust and the normal meter might say 300meg.. Apply a megga and it might test as good as a SHORT.

          That is why mega testers usually have a 250 / 500 and 1000 v test ranges to ensure that the insulation resistance; is true and realistic.

          And yes, I have on the odd occasion measured and found OC with a normal meter and then smoked the unit when turning it on... Dont take chances any more.



          Comment

          Working...
          X