If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I have a vario with a standard Silvia PF, hands free all day long, though I had to set the height on it to work and it isn't totally level but holds it no spill..
Ceramic burrs work well for espresso and drip. For press, I've heard getting the stainless steel burrs which are avail work better-less fines. Vario
After a few days use I am now comparing my Mahlkong Vario Grinder with my
Breville Smart Grinder.
The Vario should last longer, especially the ceramic burrs. It also has the advantage of having many more fine grind adjustments. The Breville is a cleaner machine with less mess on the bench and The Smart Grinder has a better portafilter holder, holding my naked PF firm and hands free while the Vario won’t.
Another minor thing is that the Breville bean hopper can be removed while containing beans.
Perhaps the German and Swiss designers could learn something from the Australian Breville engineers.
They both lead to great coffee. A $3,000 grinder may give better results but I don’t know as I don’t have one.
Barry
Last edited by Barry_Duncan; 23 March 2014, 12:23 PM.
Would have to move house to fit it in the kitchen, it is not just the GS3 price alone...
Yep... when I'm dreaming about machine upgrades it always seems that I need a bigger kitchen to fit them in... very disturbing adding up the figures and working out that the new machine could set you back well into five figure territory!
When you pay that much for a VST it's pretty annoying to not get all of it.
TampIt - are you really saying that a Vario/6910 combo made better coffee than Mazzer/GS3 (not sure what mazzer - flat or conical?)? Have you tried the Vario/GS3 combo? is that as good as the 6910 in your opinion?
Hi Bames
No, thanks to a brutal adversarial divorce, my 220V GS3 is still in Colorado, probably sitting unused in a cupboard. FWIW, I am 90% sure the Vario / GS3 would be better coffee again, however I doubt I will ever have the pleasure of pairing them up (certainly not my ex-GS3!). Would have to move house to fit it in the kitchen, it is not just the GS3 price alone...
What I am saying is that a big grinder upgrade is worth more than a big machine upgrade. Simply put, improving the earlier part of the chain makes a bigger difference than the later part (that includes farmers and the plant itself for that matter). Once something is amiss, the best machine in the world cannot correct it.
Somewhere on here there is a description of how to use a single boiler machine, I forget which, maybe a Silvia? It seemed to involve everything except standing on one leg in a westerly wind while praying to the steam god. Personally I wouldn't buy anything that requires waiting/purging/refilling and repeat cycles to get a coffee and if you're doing mainly milk coffees you really want separate paths for water and steam.
I'm not sure why you got the 'clever' comments about VST's etc - apart from being information-free they would seem to have nothing to do with your question. The white paper test is simple - pour grounds on white paper and spread them out then look at them with a magnifying glass - you're looking to check evenness of grind.
But once you get the system you want and start producing regular good coffee, naked PF and VST's are a good way to take the next step in quality coffee. But I'd make sure you know what you're doing with the standard equipment first.
A point re PID's - it's an added cost to the machine. You could do it yourself but check whether modding your machine voids the warranty. Getting it done in-house will add considerably to the bottom line so check first. I've been running my 6910 for well over a year (it was 2nd hand to begin with) and I can pour great coffees within 10 minutes of turning it on and, as above, have poured 7 in a row with no degradation in quality. You don't need to pay a fortune for the machine to get really good (sometimes great) coffee.
Given that the mazzer/gs3 combo is a bit above my price range, are there any other machine/grinder suggestions? I did get advised that single boiler machines wouldn't really suit my situation (small child in the house), would something like the simonelli oscar suit? It's more in bdb price, so would hsve to stretch the budget a little. Or are the concerns on single boiler machines overzealous, given my routine now is to purge the steam wand with water and flush the groupmsfter coffee is made (something I have been doing to see if I can maintain it in case I do get ansingle boiler). So far I have not forgotten or been distracted by more than about 5 minutes.
Last edited by erinkate84; 20 March 2014, 10:39 AM.
Reason: typo fixed
\Only half of the VST came out the other end. Bloody retention...
When you pay that much for a VST it's pretty annoying to not get all of it.
TampIt - are you really saying that a Vario/6910 combo made better coffee than Mazzer/GS3 (not sure what mazzer - flat or conical?)? Have you tried the Vario/GS3 combo? is that as good as the 6910 in your opinion?
Has anyone temp profiled a PID thermoblock like the EM7000?
Also, a vario is almost 2x the price of a compak (as in, more than the price difference between a k3p and a BSG).
At typical retail prices... I would try really hard to stretch for a k3p and a BDB.
Hi Hildy
Firstly, k3p vs Vario: not even close. My k3p did not even outperform my calibrated EM480 in a white paper test at a standard espresso grind. I use VST's, so a 20% finer grind is needed and by then it was embarrassingly poor (EM480 whipped it). Disclosure: I have just ordered a second Mahlkonig Vario as I would be devastated to have to go back to any of the other grinders relegated to my shed (17 of the most common high end domestic / low end commercial grinders until I did a major & overdue "cash converter cull" last week). Compak and Mazzer were the main offloads.
Secondly, using the same "medical grade stainless engineering workshop" where I calibrated my EM480 (which made only a small difference anyway), I tested quite a few domestic espresso machines. My older 6910 manages well over 100ml of water before the pressure / temp dropped enough to worry. Recovery time: for 60ml doubles, well under a minute (hard to measure accurately). Until you get to oversized commercial boiler machines like my 2 group (plumbed in 15Amp) La Pavoni P/TRE none of the domestic boiler ones we tested came close to that kind of performance and recovery time. Adding a PID may help some of the boiler machines, however it made no difference worth noting on the 6910 (I took it back out). My limited experience with a 7000 was that it had a lot more "shot grunt" but a hopeless milk frother (auto frother runs on time, not temp: i.e. misleading advertising and is useless to boot).
A note on consistency: My newer 6910 has never been as good, even after I reset the temp & pressure on the mainboard. I finally cracked and took it to "CC" Hilton, where they discovered it had a restriction via an incorrectly bent pipe. Now it is as good as my older 6910. Evidently it was a faulty batch... Good one SB...
Now back to the original poster: Consider the coffee chain. The roaster is earlier than the grinder which is before the machine. A brilliant grinder cannot retrieve a poor roast, and a brilliant machine cannot do much about a poor grinder. Personally, I would start by finding / becoming a good roaster, then I would spend the money on a really good grinder rather than a good machine. I have previously owned two GS3's (a 110V and a modified to US 3-phase 220V one, both still in the US) and the Vario / 6910 makes better coffee than any of my earlier grinders (some twice as dear as the Vario) into my GS3s. Now post divorce, I may end up getting another GS3 eventually (unless someone comes up with a better semi domestic beast) and I will be curious to see how much difference it makes nowadays.
I read the comparison during my research phase. I would assume the 7000 would be fairly similar to the 6910, maybe a little better. However for my untutored tastebuds, I suspect I would be hard pressed to taste the difference (also, I almost always have milk based coffee).
From what I have found, the price difference between the breville and sunbeam is over $500, even taking haggling into account. That would allow for a much better grinder, which would stay with me after the machine has been upgraded. I am happy to lurk for a while, maybe grab something second hand if it comes up.
Thanks for the opinions so far, keep them coming. And feel free to suggest something entirely different if I have missed something obvious.
@Hildy - you might be looking at old prices. JetBlack has the Touch at $539 and I've seen the Vario at $649, so the difference isn't that much. The quality spread across 7 coffees (as much as I have done at one time) in the 6910 is so small I don't think profiling would show much - or maybe I misunderstand what profiling is? My impression it is to show how much variation you get in temp/pressure when pouring a shot? I went for thermoblock initially because of what I saw about boiler machines (even twin ones) dropping performance across multiple coffees.
@Delish007 - the SB EM6910 and EM7000 are both Twin Thermoblock and Twin Pump. Steam and water have separate pumps and paths. Ideal for doing multiple coffees without much difference between first and last.
Leave a comment: