Originally posted by Toad link=1228941199/0#9 date=1229000741
Hmm, we could go on for quite some time so will just give an example, and by no means intended to suggest one machine is superior, but perhaps shows where the money goes. Rocket have obviously made an effort to make the GPP look good, but it doesnt stop there. The guts of the machine includes quality components.
At a recent get together Chris applied a Scace to the GPP and the results showed that time after time, this machine demonstrated solid performance in regard to thermostability. I believe this is due to the design and selection of componentry and configuration, eg. electronics, pipework, mass, etc.
As what I see as a decision to put form over functionality, they have replaced the wire tray with what would be a more expensive punched tray that doesnt allow spillages to fall through easily.
This is why we encourage people to make their own comparisons side-by-side whenever possible.
I hope that explains somewhat.


Leave a comment: