I browsed CoffeeSnobs extensively before I decided on purchasing my now, 4 year old, Rancilio Silvia V3. However, this is my first post.
I would now like to purchase a decent grinder that would complement my Silvia. I have no plans to upgrade in the next few years.
I have considered the Rancilio Rocky of course, but even though it is said to produce a very good grind, I gather that there may be problems, especially when living in the tropics: see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UC8VBX1Ozds. Everything rusts here, and if mold is given any opportunity to flourish, it will.
Therefore, I have narrowed down my options to mainly the Macap M2 or Kompak K3, or go up market to the Macap M4 or Mazzer Mini. Recognizing that there is a significant price difference between the two levels my question is this: is the extra expenditure of the M4 or Mazzer Mini and equivalents going to produce a noticeable improvement in quality of espresso from my Rancilio Silvia? Or would the extra quality of grinder cost not be realized in a concomitant improvement in quality of espresso?
I would now like to purchase a decent grinder that would complement my Silvia. I have no plans to upgrade in the next few years.
I have considered the Rancilio Rocky of course, but even though it is said to produce a very good grind, I gather that there may be problems, especially when living in the tropics: see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UC8VBX1Ozds. Everything rusts here, and if mold is given any opportunity to flourish, it will.
Therefore, I have narrowed down my options to mainly the Macap M2 or Kompak K3, or go up market to the Macap M4 or Mazzer Mini. Recognizing that there is a significant price difference between the two levels my question is this: is the extra expenditure of the M4 or Mazzer Mini and equivalents going to produce a noticeable improvement in quality of espresso from my Rancilio Silvia? Or would the extra quality of grinder cost not be realized in a concomitant improvement in quality of espresso?
Comment