If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I bent my wires up in a bit of a "V" (an obtuse angle of about 150deg) shape before adding the brass connectors. Very sucessful and no beans jamming. This wire is stiff but can be bent to your preferred config.
Tim
Hi Mdub. Can I ask how the motor is shielded, both electrically and physically? Is the motor and electrics contained somehow or just improvised for now?
Cheers...
Bruce...
The motor has two male spade connectors which are well insulated from the motor body. I have attached the wires from a 3 pin 240 v plug and cable to a set of insulated female spade sockets.
I have also attached an earth wire to one of the mouting lugs on the bottom of the motor.
I have temporarily mounted the motor directly to the Pizza Tray, however I will need to use a brass offset to further insulate the motor from the direct heat from the tray itself.
I suspect that I will further develop the stirrer blades before replacing the pizza tray with a SS frypan (or similar)
Out of interest, how did you couple the output shaft of the motor/gearbox to the shaft of the Stirer? Did you machine up something for the job or adapt something else for the task?
It just so happens that the shaft size of the motor matches the inside diameter of a mudgard washer.
When I attached the blades to the washers (one each side of the blade) I made sure to grind a flat section on the rounded end of the 15cm SS rule which sits against the flat of the shaft.
Once the blades were riveted in the whole thing was tightly fixed to the shaft (its still a bugger to get off)
Unfortunately I am disapointed with the stirring action of the rules, as they tend to bunch the beans up at the leading edge, and there is significantly less bean agitation when this happens.
I have found a source of special wire (read coathanger wire)which when bent into a specific shape (more on this later) stirs the beans more evenly.
Anyway back to the topic.....
I have found a place in QLD called Small parts & Bearings which has a lot of interesting bits & pieces, including teflon balls (yes balls) and motor shaft collars.
Not sure if this ios the best place to ask but here it goes
Can a turbo oven be used on its side, upside down or anywhere in between?
The next question is a risky one but Ill ask anyway...
Has anyone ever tried using a microwave to roas (nuce) beens? If yes, what were the results like?
Originally posted by B.o.r.i.s link=1107673982/15#21 date=1108621985
The next question is a risky one but Ill ask anyway...
Has anyone ever tried using a microwave to roas (nuce) beens? If yes, what were the results like?
Theres a local roaster in Wollongong that (to quote their website) "Roast using a combination of both traditional and leading edge heating technologies that minimises aroma and flavour degradation that occurs during the roasting process. In an industry that hasnt significantly advanced roasting mechanisms for centuries, we are producing a uniquely roasted coffee that will set the standard for the new millennium."
The guy that seems to run the place has his day job working at the University fiddling with things microwave so I guess there is some aspect of that being applied here but theres no details given.
their sites at www.baristasbrew.com - its pretty basic so far.
Mdub,
Have you tried using only one blade to stir? I did encounter the same problem when I was building my first wok stirrer similar to yours. It just move the beans along in a bunch rather than stiring them.
Now I just use one lower blade for small batches and the upper blade comes into play when the
batch size increases.
As my first unit also uses a motor similar to yours, the problem I have encountered batch size limitation and stir speed. It tend to stall when stirring more than 300g of beans.
Hence the stepper motor. Hope you have as much fun building your machine as I did with mine.
Originally posted by Mdub link=1107673982/15#20 date=1108592092
Anyway back to the topic.....
I have found a place in QLD called Small parts & Bearings which has a lot of interesting bits & pieces, including teflon balls (yes balls) and motor shaft collars.
I was just having a bit of a think about the stirring issue and wondered if a better stirring action might be achieved by using a longer stirrer shaft, a horizontal arm on top of this and then drop-down L shaped wire stirrers attached to the horizontal arm.
What do you think... have a chance of working? I thought it might be better to try and get the horizontal section of the stirrer mechanism up out of the bean load and just use appropriately sized and shaped wire droppers to stir the beans around. Should stop the dam effect created by having the arm submerged under the bean load. Anyway, I thought I might give this a try and see how it goes.
Very technical Mdub. I cant admit to knowing very much about Wave Theory, but is the intent to gradually move beans radially as well as circumferentially to ensure that the bulk of the beans are moved as much as possible per rotation?
Maybe you could provide a link to the website that goes into the theory, looks very interesting. I guess the proof of the design will only be known after you actually put it to the test. Would be interested to hear how it goes.
I guess with my thoughts on design, I was really trying to think of a way to remove everything other than the actual stirring component of the mechanism from the bean load. It was my intention to stagger the stirring arms(4 arms in total) such that each alternative arm moved the beans in the same radial direction and the other arm moved the beans in the opposite direction. So, looking from the top it would appear like this (very roughly):-
/\/
|
/\/
|
--/--/----/--/--
|
/\/
|
/\/
(For some reason I cant get the Vertical arm to remain on the centre of the Horizontal arm in this pseudo sketch. Youll have to use your imagination Im afraid.)
The main drive shaft would stop about 50mm above the deck of the frying pan/pizza tray and the two horizontal arms would screw into this, with a key to prevent slipping probably, and then the actual stirrers would drop down from the horizontal arms in more or less the configuration shown above. The oblique lines represent the stirrers and the straight lines the main arms.
I dont think that this would be terribly hard to knock up. Ive pretty well got everything I need in a couple of old dot matrix printer carcasses. I imagined that I would make the stirrers from some piano wire that I have left over from my radio controlled aircraft building days.
My thinking on the layout of the stirrers was based on the precept that by moving the beans in three directions, radially out, radially in and circumferentially... this should minimise the tendency for any beans to get stuck or remain in the same orientation for more than a couple of seconds at a time. Each stirrer would be sized such that there would be a small overlap in the paths swept by the stirrers ensuring that the whole frying pan/pizza tray base would be swept without the likelyhood of "blind" spots.
I know it all sounds fine in theory as well and the proof of this line of thinking will have to wait until I build it too, but at least it keeps me of the streets and it is all a bit of fun. Probably wont start building it for a couple of weeks yet but when I do, will keep a picture record of the progress I make and post up here for all to review and comment on.
I tell you one thing though, I would never have thought that as little as only twelve months ago that I would now be contemplating all these small projects in an attempt to achieve the best a bean can offer. Must be crazy ,eh? Anyway, must head off and start sketching out some of the details. Bye for now,
Firstly the wave mixing bit, was an article explaining the problem with the even mixing of emulsions, and explained that to be truly efficient a stirrer must be designed so the each of the stirring fins, moves through un-stirred liquid.
It was a fairly short article, which I can no longer find (googled about a fair bit, before finding it and only printed it at work), but Ill keep searching.
I too, toyed with the idea of fitting angled fins on the arms of my stirrer rods, but I could make it work. I hope you have better luck.
I think my motor actually turns too slow and therefore there is a natural tendancy for the beans to crowd against a fin, and this does not allow the beans to be stirred effectively.
Unfortunately it seems that the motor cant be adapted to go any faster, so I will need to look around at another motor or adding a pulley or chain drive, or making the fins more efficient.
Your comment "I would never have thought that as little as only twelve months ago that I would now be contemplating all these small projects in an attempt to achieve the best a bean can offer " is right on the money.
If I go into a shop somewhere Im always thinking of what products can be adapted to use as a roaster.
I was thinking more along the lines that the beans needed to be disturbed as often as possible to prevent uneven roasting, hence the opposing angled stirring arms.
The motors Im using are the same as yours I think, got them from Oatley Electronics a couple of weeks ago along with a swag of other stuff. I thought that if the output torque of one motor was insufficient to provide reliable operation then I would just add another unit with appropriate drive mods until this was achieved.
If this starts to become a bit too complex, I might try to source a bigger motor but finding one with such a low output speed will probably be quite difficult. I suppose I could always rat the platen drive motor out of an old printer I have and then power that via a Stepper Motor controller I think I saw someone refer to. Oatley Electronics and others have them available as kits and not too expensive.
Nothing like keeping the brain ticking over and then enjoying the fruits of ones labours, eh? All the best for now,
Originally posted by Tim link=1107673982/0#10 date=1108164371
I saw a Tiffany when I went to get the Prima and the only reason I got the Prima was that it was a bit cheaper.
The Tiffany looked pretty good to me....... if anything a little bit better quality.
At that end of the market, I wouldnt be suprised if they are all re-badged from the same factory anyway...
Tim
Ended up picking up a Prima today. It was the last one they had - the display model so I got it for $75. They had a Tiffany there for $99 (less for cash) but it didnt come with a spacer ring which I thought might be handy so I saved some cash and got the Prima. Now to work out what Im going to do with it....
Mdub, et al. Whats the state of the art in stirrer design?
Comment